PDA

View Full Version : A silly little Naruto movie by Fourbros


fourbros
04-20-2015, 11:12 AM
This was made by one of the other four brothers, not me.

Anyways, I thought that this is cool, so I'm posting it. Enjoy!

RavenOfCode
04-21-2015, 04:17 AM
Looks cool :) Im trying it out now :)

RavenOfCode
04-21-2015, 04:21 AM
That was awesome :)

I really like the way the camera didnt just stay in one place the whole time... :) Makes it alot more realistic, and the animations were very high quality for Alice...

Good job! =D

Funnybone
04-21-2015, 05:08 AM
Wish I could view it. :(

fourbros
04-21-2015, 08:19 AM
Wish I could view it. :(

Why can't you view it? Errors during the loading portion?

RavenOfCode
04-22-2015, 05:42 AM
Wish I could view it. :(

You could be more descriptive... that would be helpful... as you do this on almost every post...

Funnybone
04-22-2015, 11:19 AM
I try. >:/

Moving on, the reason why I can't view it is because I am on Linux Ubuntu. If anyone complains about Ubuntu once they shouldn't be surprised why I am angry.
And with Alice 2.x, I need to make a binary. You know, it's not all that difficult to have an .exe come along side the Linux download. I mean, it's a better option, and it's time saving, too! :D

Nope. See, people are saying "we know it's possible to make .exes work on Linux but since we're too stupid, we're going to let you do the work for us.", and I'm not implying this specific community.

What I'm saying is that anybody/anything that requires me (or another Linux user) to make binaries is saying the above. I don't make fun of the intelligence of my surroundings/people, but if somebody were to see that a left turn on a red was allowed, they'd instead do the right turn on red, and potentially kill someone.


It's all of that, but in a nutshell. As said before, I don't mean this specific community is stupid, I'm implying that their idea for Linux users to waste (insert longest time period here) of their life is almost like "Why?"

It's pretty simple to make a Linux version of Alice because, well, they wrote it, and made the application, so can't they make a copy and change it to Linux code so it can run as .exe on Linux?

Nope. Too lazy, so they make users with little-to-no knowledge of making binaries do it.

That, everybody, is everybody's "unique thinking" when it comes to Linux. Disappointing, I know, but I just described for you all what it's like for me when I use Linux.

"Can't get simple .exes, so instead, we need this over-exaggerated way of making something work, and can't get a simple .exe because you're a Linux user, so we're proud to waste (insert longest time period here again) of your time! >:)"

RavenOfCode
04-22-2015, 03:39 PM
I try. >:/

Moving on, the reason why I can't view it is because I am on Linux Ubuntu. If anyone complains about Ubuntu once they shouldn't be surprised why I am angry.
And with Alice 2.x, I need to make a binary. You know, it's not all that difficult to have an .exe come along side the Linux download. I mean, it's a better option, and it's time saving, too! :D

Nope. See, people are saying "we know it's possible to make .exes work on Linux but since we're too stupid, we're going to let you do the work for us.", and I'm not implying this specific community.

What I'm saying is that anybody/anything that requires me (or another Linux user) to make binaries is saying the above. I don't make fun of the intelligence of my surroundings/people, but if somebody were to see that a left turn on a red was allowed, they'd instead do the right turn on red, and potentially kill someone.


It's all of that, but in a nutshell. As said before, I don't mean this specific community is stupid, I'm implying that their idea for Linux users to waste (insert longest time period here) of their life is almost like "Why?"

It's pretty simple to make a Linux version of Alice because, well, they wrote it, and made the application, so can't they make a copy and change it to Linux code so it can run as .exe on Linux?

Nope. Too lazy, so they make users with little-to-no knowledge of making binaries do it.

That, everybody, is everybody's "unique thinking" when it comes to Linux. Disappointing, I know, but I just described for you all what it's like for me when I use Linux.

"Can't get simple .exes, so instead, we need this over-exaggerated way of making something work, and can't get a simple .exe because you're a Linux user, so we're proud to waste (insert longest time period here again) of your time! >:)"

So as I understand your annoyed that because I don't use Linux and use Windows instead... that I should make you .exe's for your alice stuff?

And why cant you just open alice and use .a2w's as alice doesn't run .exe's?

Or are you not even talking about .a2w's working on alice?

Sorry im kinda confused... :0

:) I dont use ubunto... i think i would be bad at it... lol

fourbros
04-22-2015, 05:21 PM
I try. >:/

Moving on, the reason why I can't view it is because I am on Linux Ubuntu. If anyone complains about Ubuntu once they shouldn't be surprised why I am angry.
And with Alice 2.x, I need to make a binary. You know, it's not all that difficult to have an .exe come along side the Linux download. I mean, it's a better option, and it's time saving, too! :D

Nope. See, people are saying "we know it's possible to make .exes work on Linux but since we're too stupid, we're going to let you do the work for us.", and I'm not implying this specific community.

What I'm saying is that anybody/anything that requires me (or another Linux user) to make binaries is saying the above. I don't make fun of the intelligence of my surroundings/people, but if somebody were to see that a left turn on a red was allowed, they'd instead do the right turn on red, and potentially kill someone.


It's all of that, but in a nutshell. As said before, I don't mean this specific community is stupid, I'm implying that their idea for Linux users to waste (insert longest time period here) of their life is almost like "Why?"

It's pretty simple to make a Linux version of Alice because, well, they wrote it, and made the application, so can't they make a copy and change it to Linux code so it can run as .exe on Linux?

Nope. Too lazy, so they make users with little-to-no knowledge of making binaries do it.

That, everybody, is everybody's "unique thinking" when it comes to Linux. Disappointing, I know, but I just described for you all what it's like for me when I use Linux.

"Can't get simple .exes, so instead, we need this over-exaggerated way of making something work, and can't get a simple .exe because you're a Linux user, so we're proud to waste (insert longest time period here again) of your time! >:)"

Thanks funnybone, that was entertaining; this has to be the first rant that I've ever seen on Alice. BTW, here's the video on my brother's youtube channel. It has some different music, but it's the same stuff otherwise. Enjoy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrFfboJkoGQ

And please subscribe and like and all that good stuff :D

Funnybone
04-22-2015, 10:24 PM
Missed the point. Again.

What I said is that Linux needs me or other users to make binaries. An example is Alice 2.x. It needs me to make a binary, but they can't make another .exe with Linux code?

fourbros
04-23-2015, 07:19 AM
Missed the point. Again.

What I said is that Linux needs me or other users to make binaries. An example is Alice 2.x. It needs me to make a binary, but they can't make another .exe with Linux code?

Did you watch the video in the link? Did you like it? Also, maybe you should consider not using Linux if it gives you this much trouble. It sounds like a real hassle.

x2495iiii
04-23-2015, 11:07 AM
Liking the positive attitude from Raven and fourbros.

The video was nice, but I would have hoped to see some texturing done to the character model. Something as simple as coloring his shirt, arms, and pants orange would have worked for me.