Rubik's cube.

Here is a working rubik's cube.

-It shuffles itself in a way that should always be solveable. (Give it a a few seconds to shuffle)
-It can tell when you have completed it.
-The green sphere is used to turn the cube one side away.
-The red sphere is used to get a good view of all sides of the cube.
-You can click and drag the mouse to turn a row column or the whole cube.
-If you want to simply click. press the space bar to switch to a seperate mode where you click a sticker then a direction.
-I tested this for a while and it should be glitch free. (please report any, if there are any, so i can fix them.)

EDIT: fixed the red sphere niteshifter.
EDIT2: 1.4 added.

[dubastot]

I am glad to see you are back veryuhbull!

Found something. While the cube is scrambling itself up and you press the red sphere, the cube's pieces will rotate themselves into a jumbled mess.

Originally Posted by Niteshifter

Found something. While the cube is scrambling itself up and you press the red sphere, the cube's pieces will rotate themselves into a jumbled mess.

I actually knew about this and attemted to fix it but it evidently did not save the first time. reuploaded to fix.

[jediaction]

It never stops mixing up. I could probably solve 3/4ths of it. I can in real life

This is the second complaint about the shuffle. So i will attempt to address it. It takes less than a minute to shuffle (on my computer) and then you can go.

Are you really that impatent jediaction? (unless you have a valid bug.) I may attempt at some point to entirely rehaul the whole randomize method to account for impatient people.

The reason it goes that slow is because i use a randomized pick from all cubes. It then calls the turn methods. I tried copying the code into the method to cut out the call time but that changed nothing.

So i am inclined to believe it is the "selected" set value to random item. that causes the slow down. Even when i set the world speed multiplyer on an unreasonablly high number it does little. (maybe shaving off a second or two.)

If this is so painful a problem i might just scrap that method for a psuedo-random one. Any suggestions would be gladly accepted.

EDIT: I scraped the old and created a better faster method that is still random.

[jediaction]

I sped it up x10 for a minute. It never takes that long